Quotations responded to replaced by suitable, concise summaries in brackets. Original post at link provided, accessible by Britpoly members and cronies.
http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/Britpoly/message/13919
[Sulk]
Not at all. I can think of several, eminently more appropriate places.
[David Icke]
Compared to the last present time?
[Philosophical abuse]
They want to read Kant?
[Glass houses]
People with all kinds of religion, including religio romana evidently, preach nonsense.
[Non sequitur]
Jesus was immersed in a culture in which the dominant religion was a monotheism, actually.
[Lost temper]
I have the first 3, I do not need the last 2. Those things which I want are nothing to do with the vain goals which you mention here which, I infer, are your own. Also, I’m not entirely sure you know what is meant by categorical imperative.
[Bollocks]
Bollocks. You’ve been off on a self-aggrandising Doctor Who fantasy in most of your replies.
[Daft question]
Yes, because existence is quotidian. Every morning I walk to the window and open the curtains and, lo, there is existence.
[Foot stamping]
I display amusement when presented with pretentious gobbledegook. How do you like these responses?
[Faux sagacity]
I think you’ve met none of the first and precious few of the second, if your proud manner is anything to go by.
[Faux sagacity]
Watch out for that first step.
No comments:
Post a Comment